Commercial · new builds

New commercial buildings, from a bare site.

Ground-up commercial construction across South Australia, Victoria and New South Wales. Offices, education and community facilities, clinics and mixed-use buildings.

A two-storey Australian commercial building at first-floor panel stage, drawn rather than photographed because the library holds no JCGAU-entity image of one. The perimeter carries the Rev 10 mesh artwork exactly as issued: ivory safety register across the top, the mark reversed on the ink field, the credit rail along the base, and the copper plinth rule closing the bottom edge unbroken the length of the fence.
$20m
Project capacity under a single contract
3
States we build in: South Australia, Victoria and New South Wales
BLD 344769
JCGAU builder licence
15+
Years of the director’s delivery experience

The premise

On a new build, the site is rarely what sets the date.

Approvals, service connections and long-lead elements are all decided off-site, by people who do not work for you, on timelines you cannot compress.

A new building is the one project type where the construction programme is the shorter half of the story. Between a decision to build and a slab pour sits a sequence of consents, referrals, utility applications and procurement commitments, and each of them has a queue.

So the first thing we do on a new build is not price the building. It is map what has to be lodged, ordered or applied for, and when. That map is the programme. Everything else follows it.

THE CONSENT PATH: THREE SEPARATE APPROVALS, NOT ONE Planning Land use, form, amenity, car parking, referrals Building Code compliance, fire safety, structural, access Occupancy Essential safety measures, certificates, sign-off EACH STATE CALLS THEM SOMETHING DIFFERENT SA. Planning consent, building rules consent, development approval VIC. Planning permit, building permit, occupancy permit  ·  NSW. Development consent, construction certificate, occupation certificate Service connection applications Power, water, sewer, telecommunications. Not part of the consent path. Longer than it. Long-lead building elements Façade, lifts, switchboards, plant. Ordered off design, not off approval. These two run beside the approvals, not after them. Started late, they set the date.
Planning, building and occupancy are three separate consents, and the names change across the three states we work in. The two items in copper sit outside the consent path entirely. They are the ones that most often set the completion date.

Before the site

What we do in the first six weeks.

SITE

Geotechnical investigation, survey, contamination history, existing services located rather than assumed. Everything under the ground that is discovered later is a variation.

AUTHORITY

The referral bodies for this site and this use, identified and approached early. A referral nobody knew about is the single most common cause of a programme reset.

SERVICES

Load and demand estimated well enough to lodge connection applications, because the distributor’s clock does not start until the application does.

PROCUREMENT

Which elements are fabricated to order and therefore have to be designed first. Façade, lifts, switchboards, generation and specialist plant, in that order of pain.

The programme

Five streams, and the one that finishes last.

The building is not usually the thing that decides the completion date.

AWARD PRACTICAL COMPLETION Design Planning and building approvals Service connection applications Long-lead procurement Construction Commissioning and handover The copper stream is the one nobody owns and everybody waits for. It is lodged in week one on our projects.
Every stream starts at award. Construction begins last and still is not the constraint, because the connection application sits outside everybody’s control and runs furthest to the right. No durations are shown, because they belong to a specific project rather than to a web page.

Before the site

What we do in the first six weeks.

The ground

Geotechnical investigation, survey, contamination history and existing services located rather than assumed.

The referrals

Every referral body for this site and this use identified before the programme is written, not after.

The connections

Load estimated well enough to lodge, because the distributor clock starts at the application rather than at the decision.

The long leads

Which elements are fabricated to order, and therefore have to be designed first.

Structure and envelope

The two decisions that shape everything after them.

Structural system

Steel frame, in-situ concrete or precast, each with a different balance of programme, weather exposure, crane requirement and site footprint. On a constrained urban site the choice is often made by the crane and the truck access, not by the engineer.

Façade

The longest-lead element on most commercial buildings, and the one most often still being resolved when it needs to be ordered. It also carries the thermal performance the building is assessed on and, since the cladding reforms, a materials compliance trail that has to be documented rather than assumed.

Vertical transport

Lifts are ordered against a shaft that has to be built accurately. The lift supplier’s programme is not negotiable in the way a trade programme is.

Services strategy

Whether plant sits on the roof, in a basement or in a plant room changes the structure, the acoustics, the façade and the useable floor area. It is a concept decision that is frequently deferred to detail design, where it becomes expensive.

Weather

Every programme we issue identifies when the building becomes weathertight, because that date governs when every internal trade can start. A programme that does not show it is not a programme.

A referral nobody identified is not a delay. It is a restart.

Institutional new build · library image

Sustainability

Written into the contract, or it does not happen.

Energy performance is now a compliance requirement rather than an aspiration, and where a client is pursuing a rating, the evidence has to be collected during construction, not assembled afterwards from whatever records happen to exist.

We treat rating evidence the way we treat any other deliverable: a named person, a due date and a place it is filed. Commissioning records, product data, waste tracking and air-tightness results are collected as the work happens. Retrospective evidence is either unavailable or expensive, and usually both.

Working with us

What makes the first conversation useful.

  • The site, and whether you own itTitle, survey, easements and any existing approval. Conditional purchases change the sequence completely.
  • What the building is forUse class drives the code path, the fire strategy and the referrals. It is the single most informative thing you can tell us.
  • Who is designing it, if anyone yetA design already in progress and a blank page are different starting points, and neither is a problem.
  • The date that actually mattersA lease expiry, a funding milestone, an academic year, a season. Programmes built backwards from a real date behave differently from programmes built forwards from a start.
  • The budget, honestlyIncluding whether it is a board-approved figure or an aspiration. We would rather tell you early that the brief and the budget do not meet.

Questions

Can you help before we own the site?

Yes, and it is often the most valuable point to be involved. Feasibility, buildability and an order-of-cost view before a purchase decision is cheaper than discovering the constraint after.

Do you work with our architect, or do you bring your own?

Either. On a traditional contract we build to your consultant team’s documents. Under design and construct we can bring a team or take yours across by novation.

How early do you need the design finished?

Not finished. Resolved in the right order. The elements that get fabricated need to be designed first, and finishes can be settled much later than most people assume.

What is the most common cause of a blown programme on a new build?

A service connection or an authority referral that was not identified at the start. Both are visible in week one to anyone who goes looking.

Send us the site and the use.

With those two things we can tell you what the approval path looks like, what has a queue in front of it, and where the programme risk actually sits.

Submit a project brief

Related work